Spoilers: Detective #1001 First Full Arkham Knight?

18 thoughts on “Spoilers: Detective #1001 First Full Arkham Knight?”

1. It’s all there except for the ID… I’d still say 1st full though. Btw spoilers are much easier to follow, I like the change.

   1. Thanks

2. 1002 is gonna be ordered less that 01 most likely. I would say the markets gonna choose 2.

3. Pretty easy first full after dialogue, fight scene with Batman where he uses his shield, and final page with action pose.

   1. And….1st New Detective Comics Logo! ?

4. If you count the cover appearance I say it’s a full, right Liefeld?

   1. 1001A will rule them all, in other words.

   2. Please don’t invoke Liefeld’s name or we are going to get a Variant by him with Arkham Knight with huge shoulder pads and pouches. (No feet)

      1. Understood. What I really mean is 1001A is slabworthy (best cover) plus part of interior story. In a tie between Cameo or full, it’s the cover that’s the tie breaker usually.

   3. well…..planet comicon in KC has him on the cover of the 1000 exclusive

5. 1001A looks like a full. He appears in multiple panels, it has dialogue and a cover appearance.

6. Its a first full. They didnt have to ID him in the dialogue, they did that on the cover and on the last page and pane…

7. I would say 1st full appearance. He is on the cover, and talks in the issue.

   1. Yup… Name is on the cover… Hes on the cover. Hes in multiple panes, theres dialogue…. There shouldnt even be any debate its a first full unless we conclude the Arkham Knight #1 from 2015 is still the first appearance….

8. Definitely a 1st app. That Finch variant is gonna be hot !

   1. I think the Cover A will win long term though since it’s all about Arkham and he’s on the cover.

9. I think all this cameo vs first appearance is stupid. By definition, a cameo IS a first appearance. You can’t cameo without appearing.

   1. You can’t over dry….you cant over die.

Comments are closed.