Heavily Censored Image of Savage Dragon #225 XXX 

Just in case you were interested in what the Savage Dragon #225 XXX cover was here is your chance to see it. Mind you the image is heavily censored but it doesn’t take much to figure out what is going on.
Since we try to stay on the family friendly side of things the image is redacted behind a spoiler warning. 18 and up. Still NSFW.

Savage Dragon #225 XXX can be ordered here for $9.59

36 thoughts on “Heavily Censored Image of Savage Dragon #225 XXX ”

    1. Agreed. …why even make this cover? What is the point? I think this move will actually hurt this title rather than increase sales. Pretty low brow…..

      1. I’m still surprised this title is still going. One of my shops doesn’t even order it to my knowledge.

  3. I don’t know anyone who reads this title either. What they should be doing is more cover art like the April Fool’s Jock Variant—very clever and a great looking cover—THAT will increase sales.

  4. Not impressed, this is just blantent porn and isn’t going make me want to buy it … plain old desperate in my opinion

  5. WOW!! I can’t believe that Image is getting away with that cover. But yet DC wasn’t able to print the killing Joke Batgirl cover. What a shame!

    1. I’ve agreed with you about a lot of things, Jesus, but on this one I’ve got to disagree. DC pulled the, “Killing Joke,”-themed Batgirl cover because fans were offended by how the imagery suggested a sexual overtone of no consent. Batgirl was tied-up and the Joker was pointing a gun down toward her crotch in a menacing manner. It was up to DC to pull the cover and they did, and I see why. This cover, as explicit as it, clearly shows everyone consenting and having great time, so while it is 100 times more racy than the, Batgirl cover with its sexual connotations, the vague suggestion of sexual assault was what upset many, I feel. Do I make any sense or do you just think I’m rambling?

        1. I think the point of this was to get people talking about Savage Dragon again and it worked.
          Sent from my iPhone
          >

  6. Meh… My opinion only but I thought Larson had more respect for his creations than to have it now equate to little more than a desperate cash grab. I’m sure it will sell but I doubt it will bring in any new readers…If anything, long term, the reader base might decrease.

  7. Whoa…wasnt expecting that…but it doesnt bother me. Look out for upcoming Image month theme!…jk Lol

  8. Wow ! That shocked me and i’m open minded on most things, but im laughing at it now. Whats next Teenage turtles spit roasting Teen Titans ?????

  9. Eh, it doesn’t strike me as any more racy than the variant covers the publisher Boundless sometimes does. It’s clearly over-the-top but that’s the point and if it sells enough copies to turn a profit for Larsen and Image, I suppose they’ll be happy!

  10. I have never understood why boobs and dicks et al are censored. But killing humans and destroying life is perfectly acceptable. mind boggled

    1. The world needs more nudity for sure…. Just not on Savage Dragon covers…. 😉

  12. Not for the personal collection, but I bought one. I’m also going to sell that one for 3x cover to a consenting adult. I have an expensive comic habit and if I need to peddle smut…

  13. Wow this thread is hilarious – not to mention the cover. Haha I ordered Two. Love TFAW. Suprised to see the variant there. They rarely have variants. Thanks for posting this Anthony!!

  14. I could be wrong but I don’t see this having any after market value.

  15. I had my LCS order two for me, and I don’t usually get SD anymore. So, it worked!

  16. Im ordering one this is by far better than shirtless bear fighter nude baby variant .thats just weird.

  18. this cover is#awesomesauce. I ordered ten copies of it .really don’t think it is thatoffensive at all . I can write,direct,produce,star&distrubite anentire fan faction fanf ilm straight from this cover alone . but that’s just me as I eat this stuff up . and savage dragon has always been at the middle to the bottom of the top 300 diamond best sellers list . a decent flagship and image original creation with and this what I respect the most no relaunch no renumbering no big two b.s. attached just a old school comic book but then again your listening to someone that is trying to figure out who owns the rights to cherry pop tart and that line of comics to nogate a film deal . I agree 100% with davidbitterboum about batgirl #41 I saw nothing wrong witht he cover image as I reed killing joke but that in this b.s.p.c. world we live in people got upset and offeneded and dc caved in and canceled it sensorship is wrong no matter what #testify and can someone plese answer me this ? in the world we live in ??? in a day and age where we have unde variants of shirtless bear fighter #1 we have action lab studios with all the risky variants of dollface&zombie tramph we have zenscope and its wonderfull magicall and gloriousdisplay of tna we have back isses like r crumb and of course my favorite of all time cherry pop tart and we all love adam heughs&j scott cambelll covers so I ask sowhats the big stinking deal???? thank you for all the friendship&surport I love you guys have a safe 4th of july
    blind adam out

  19. I stopped supporting anything Larson does around election time… not because of his views, but because of his constant complaining. I won’t support this either. I unfollowed him on Twitter and will not purchase anything he produces anymore. Message to Artist and Celebs…. I don’t follow you to read 99% politics and 1% “the stuff your famous for”.

    1. I agree with you. I hate politics in comics and hate seeing comic creators blabbing about their politics, even if I agree with them.

  20. and yet think of the last time anyone here looked at porn, no one wants to think about that !

Comments are closed.